This is interesting:
Build It. Share It. Profit. Can Open Source Hardware Work?
The computer tech world has long been a testing bed for "gift" type transactions, as evidenced by the open source movement (Linux, Firefox, etc.). Giving away hardware specs and declining the financial opportunity of patents is a significant increase of the ante.
And why do we have patents? To incentivize innovation? If so, why do we need to decouple innovation and necessity (i.e., "Necessity is the mother of invention") by offering liquid profits? Does this imply a market driven by greed, and perhaps also resulting in excess innovation? Are patents not also a handmaiden to market branding, a way of creating apparent exclusivity, thereby driving up demand. It seems to be about the appearance of scarcity.
No comments:
Post a Comment