Why Jesus Should Have Been Institutionalized

By the modern day standards by which individuals of questionable sanity are deemed to be proper candidates for institutionalization or, at least, to be highly psychotropically medicated, Jesus clearly fits the bill to receive the benefits of either intervention. In fact, given the definition of what constitutes a mental disorder in the DSM-IV-TR, the bible of psychological diagnoses, there is likely no known person in the history of mankind who would have qualified for systemic, institutionalized psychiatric treatment more than Christ.(1) And when the DSM-IV-TR’s definition of “mental disorder” is taken in conjunction with the criteria for involuntary committal as delineated in North Carolina state law, the latter stating that a “client” may be “involuntarily committed” if “[there] is, without the benefit of the specific treatment measure, a significant possibility that the client will harm self or others before improvement of the client's condition is realized”, there is no doubt that, whether against his will or not, Jesus, of all people, should have been promptly and indefinitely committed. (2)

For at least as far as the New Testament witness in concerned, Jesus’ speech and behavior most certainly show that he posed a consummate threat to himself.(3) For example, he intentionally gave up what could have been a stable income in carpentry, leading perhaps to marriage, children, and a comfortable domestic situation, in order to wander around as a homeless, single, poverty-stricken nomad. Further still, the people with whom he ended up spending most of his time were typically those of deeply suspect personal histories, many of whom had long public records of socially deviant behavior, and the likes of which included hookers, scam artists, and zealous infidels of high volatility. Similarly, he showed no regard for his own personal safety when it came to the risks involving his physical health, exposing himself to the leprous and variously and violently demonized with a reckless and unrepentant regularity. The way that Jesus spoke and the paranoid language he so often used certainly warranted his immediate hospitalization, as well, endlessly speaking, as he did, of dark and apocalyptic nightmares that he so delusively believed would come true. His ability to rightly and safely judge the character of others was also clearly shown to be impaired, given his willingness to befriend and maintain close associations with Judas Iscariot, a man whom he knew would eventually hand him over to be tortured and sadistically killed. In fact, Jesus evinced the ultimate symptom warranting his hospitalization by his intentionally choosing to travel to Jerusalem at Passover, knowing full well that such would culminate in the prolonged brutality that was his crucifixion.

But as if the harm Jesus posed to himself were not enough, it is equally clear that Jesus represented a serious threat to the well-being of others, as well. For not only did he convince the twelve disciples to give up their jobs and financial security as he had done, but he also explicitly called upon and convinced them to de-prioritize their respective families and loved ones in order to follow him. He likewise thoughtlessly endangered them by negligently bringing the twelve into his own psychotic web of social irresponsibility, exposing them to the same group of miscreants, diseases, and lifestyle of poverty that he had chosen for himself. And, to top it off, he knowingly brainwashed them to adopt a manner of life and practice whereby each would be killed as was he, intentionally grooming each disciple for the grisly and senseless demise that is martyrdom. He even went so far as to set up an organization formed in his name (i.e., the Church) which he consciously intended to be an ongoing recruitment program for the promotion of the same maladjusted and disordered lifestyle he had chosen for himself and his twelve disciples! Certainly, apart from merely being a harm to himself, Jesus presented (and still yet presents!) an unprecedented danger to countless scores of others.

Thus, in light of the above, there can be no doubt whatsoever that Jesus was stark, raving mad, posing a significant risk of injury both to himself and those surrounding him, clearly requiring the corrective aid that comes from institutionalization and high doses of psychotropic medicine (and all this is to say nothing of the need to have involuntarily committed other biblical figures like the camel-suit-wearing, locust-eating, desert-dwelling, ranting, apocalyptic preacher, John the Baptist, or the split-personality, megalomaniac, and glutton for punishment that was St. Paul).

Sadly, none of the enlightened individuals who encountered him sufficiently loved Christ or were responsible enough to have him indefinitely committed for redemptive psychiatric treatment. And, as a result, it seems we have little room not to seriously question their basic morality or any claim they might have made about being altruistically concerned about the needs of the mentally ill. For, clearly, if they did not perceive or did not act upon the fact that Jesus, the recruiter of martyrs and willingly crucified, was certifiably crazy and in need of the state’s intervention to protect himself and others from the danger that he plainly was, then obviously the bible from which they mistakenly discerned what constitutes “disorder” and/or the means by which such should be treated was something embarrassingly frail or irrelevant in comparison with the infallible canon of the American Psychiatric Association that is the DSM-IV-TR or North Carolina state law. Indeed, it seems we have significant reason to ponder why they were so cruelly and irresponsibly unwilling to help Jesus when he so obviously needed it, or why it was they allowed for the prolonging of his undeniable suffering. For, given what I’ve outlined above, if Jesus isn’t the quintessential poster child of the mentally deranged or psychologically sick, desperately in need of institutionalized medical assistance, then I cannot imagine who is. If only the truly wise around him had loved Jesus or been responsible enough to properly intervene on his behalf, perhaps he could have been rescued from himself and the inevitable fate that would result from his psychosis! What a wonderful thing that would have been! What a tragedy that it did not occur.
________________________

(1) “In DSM-IV, each of the mental disorders is conceptualized as a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern that occurs in an individual and that is associated with present distress (e.g., a painful symptom) or disability (i.e., impairment in one or more areas of functioning) or with a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, disability, or an important loss of freedom.” American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision. (Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2000), xxxi.

(2) Quoted from North Carolina state law122C-57.e.2. Cf. http://www.psychlaws.org/legalresources/StateLaws/NorthCarolinastatute.htm

(3) Each of the specific claims regarding Jesus and his ministry can be supported by textual evidence from the four canonical Gospels. The reader is encouraged to read through those texts for herself, should verification be desired.